4. SMALL RUSSIAN "HOLOCAUST" IN MODERN ISRAEL
      Since 1960-s Israeli propaganda machine, Israeli embassy in Moscow,
      Sochnut and intelligent services began to provoke Soviet citizens to
      immigrate to Israel. Most of the Russian-speaking people were persecuted
      and discriminated in Israel even by then. However, close to 1990-s this
      tendency has developed in a real "small genocide". In the 1980-s 1990-s
      almost 700 thousands people from USSR (and - later - post USSR) were
      smartly pushed to Israel by deception, provocation, sometimes by force.
      Israelis had plans to turn most of them into servants and slaves to
      replace Arabs, who became too dangerous for "sabras" and "vatikim".
      "Russians" were deprived of any social or translation assistance. Sochnut
      and the Ministry of Absorption (Immigration) only pretended to provide
      some assistance, in reality not giving any. "Russian" puppet organizations
      like Sharansky's Zionist Forum, etc. were founded by the Israeli government
      and provided no real help either. New "Russian" immigrants were left
      one on one with the housing agents (mediators) or landlords, employers,
      etc. Most of them became victims of indescribable frauds and cheating.
      "Russian" immigrants were deprived of real welfare or financial assistance.
      They were forced to pay $500 - 600 a months for 2-3 - room neglected,
      non renovated apartments, and deprived of the social houses. When hundreds
      of thousands of the government-subsidized fresh-constructed apartments
      stood empty, thousands of "Russian" families found themselves on the
      verge of evictions or homeless in the streets. Under International, Jewish
      Diaspora's and internal criticism the Israeli government in a stubborn
      intention not to give "Russians" social houses started to import astronomically
      expensive one-room caravans, which price was higher then a construction
      of a conventional apartment. Caravan villages, intentionally placed
      in wilderness, far from cities, with no schools, cultural facilities
      or clubs, surrounded by barbed wires like prisons, intentionally populated
      not only by "Russians" but also by Hebrew speaking criminals, declassed
      social elements, drug-users, alcoholics, and by new arrivals from underdeveloped
      African countries, became artificially-created first "Russian" ghettoes.
      At summer caravans inhabitants suffered from unbearable heat, at winter
      - from cold. Each caravan was an overcrowded, miserable tiny place,
      never designed as a habitation. Caravan villages were dirty, devastated
      cloaks, where generations of undereducated, non cultural, futureless
      "Russian" kids were raised. Arik SHARON, by then - Minister of Construction,
      - was mostly responsible for that. Israeli media and state propaganda
      was rousing hatred towards Russian speaking people by portraying them
      as enemies, alcoholics, undeveloped, wild people. Crimes against "Russians"
      like assaults, batteries, insults, rapes, fraud, racism, discrimination,
      expropriation of property or vandalism against property, lawfulness
      illegal evictions, and many others, were never stopped or prosecuted. "Russians"
      had no police protection. "Russian" children were discriminated, abused,
      beaten, killed at schools or even pre-schools, tens of thousands of
      "Russian" women have been raped, "Russian" workers were not paid at
      all or paid less then the minimum wage, abused, beaten, and injured
      at work. Two sections of Israeli law - "Kablanut" and "Kviyut" codes
      - enabled to turn many "Russians" into temporary or permanent slaves.
      What we see today as assaults on Arabs was in 1990-s "rehearsed" on
      "Russians". Because there were no labor norms of exploiting "kablan"-hired
      unprotected "Russians", thousands and thousands were injured, killed,
      or became handicapped at work. Assaults on "Russians" and rapes of Russian
      speaking women became a kind of a sport for Hebrew speaking neighbors,
      employers, or supervisors, and the policemen. No killer or rapist was
      never prosecuted! The main excuse for crimes against the Russian speaking
      people in Israel was that Russians are hidden Christians. "Russians"
      were forced to leave biggest Israeli cities, new legislation to restrict
      them from residing in Haifa, Jerusalem, or Tel Aviv. They were moved
      to "developing" cities with no work and law life standards like Afula,
      Ashdod, Kiriat-Gat, Dimona, Beer-Sheva, etc. There artificial secondary
      (after caravans) "Russian" ghettos were created, where new generations
      of "Russians" are raised in poverty, discrimination, futureless and forced
      to the criminal sphere of life. Hundreds of thousands of "Russians"
      fled Israel. Israeli government and the local Jewish organizations like
      Bnei Brith are responsible for persecuting these people in Canada, USA,
      and Europe, influencing or invading immigration institutions in many
      countries to force them back to Israel. (see More)
      Resources about persecutions of the Russian-speaking people in Israel:
      Gregory SVIRSKY, Efraim SEVELA, Efraim MELAMED, Michael DORFMAN,
      Savely KASHNIZKI, Alexander ORLOVSKY, Rivka RABINOVICH, Irma
      ZIKOL, etc. Main works on "small" Russian genocide in Israel: Lev
      GUNIN.GULAG of Palestine. (Editor - Svetlana EPIFANOVA). Lev GUNIN.
      JEWISH WARS.
      5. PROVOKING ANTISEMITISM
      Let's imagine that lobbies of nation X around the world
      made any discussions about X-ish genocide forbidden, and this is when
      the leaders of X-s continue benefiting from enormous compensation almost
      a century after the genocide. Using historically inevitable from time
      to time unfriendly tendencies towards just any minority as an excuse,
      nation's X leaders are using excessive force against any manifestation
      of such unfriendly attitude or even what they wrongly interpreting as
      "unfriendly". Consequently denouncing bloody crimes against
      humanity of the regime of the State of X and local X-s councils (organizations)
      in Diaspora is called "xenophobia". Anybody, who raised deep
      questions about the human rights situation in the State of X and within
      local X-s communities, is severely persecuted. Naturally, such a policy
      would provoke spontaneous anti-X-ers feelings, and the denial of X-ish
      genocide as the most natural automatic reaction. In the same way simple
      as not very simple people will always test extremes of the "Jewish
      power"; and "Jewish conspiracy" by denying Holocaust and
      watching an expected Jewish excessive force in return. Blocking any
      civilized discussion about any topic directly or indirectly involving
      Jews (on historical, philosophical, ethical, religious level), Jewish
      extremists will face more and more dangerous for innocent ordinary Jews
      response on the primitive level. Jewish extremist organizations and
      the government of Israel do not care about safety and wealth of ordinary
      Jews. They represent a mighty totalitarian power, which exist in no
      one interests. Only a small group of bastards benefits from this power.
      This power became a modern inquisition, one of the modern Evils. However,
      only one of Them. Communist regimes, eastern dictatorships, Indian-type
      "democracies" (Israel is just one of them), anti-European
      regimes like Pakistan, Afganistan, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, etc.
      they are the same. We (people who consider themselves as Europeans,
      no matter what skin color or face they have) must understand who are
      enemies and who are friends of Europe. We have already our culture half
      destroyed, our leaders corrupted by the Eastern powers, our countries
      in Northern hemisphere (plus Australia) have been already transformed
      into a "transitional" (remember: Eastern block, Western
      block?) between capitalism (democracy) - and Eastern-type tyranny-slavery.
      Since 1980-s, by eliminating civil freedoms and privacy, Western governments
      slowly but inevitably transforming their countries into societies of
      the eastern type. Jewish extremism is an important player in this process
      of blowing up the European civilization from within. Jewish extremists
      are traditionally anti-democratic reactionaries, who's goals are to destroy
      democracy and progressive thinking everywhere. Their doctrine is to
      take just any rights from the people, turn majority into slaves, and
      eliminate basic human rights and freedoms. Their main allay is not USA
      or Canada - as most of us are thinking - but UK. How comes that Israel,
      a country, where Christians are persecute, beaten and humiliated, became
      the most important "friend" of the Christian world? How comes that the
      most brutal regimes in the world - like India, Israel, Pakistan, or
      Kazakstan, were called democracies? Why and by whom Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,
      South Korea, Kazahstan, Israel and other countries with hatred to European
      culture and anti-European propaganda were considered as allays - and
      Iraq, Lebanon, Iran, or Serbia - not? Tyranny, starvation, exploitation
      of children, numbers of repressed people, scale of poverty and homelessness
      in Iraq, Iran, and some other anti-democracies are several times lower
      then in "great democracies" like India or Israel, where wide number
      of people are treated like cattle. How comes that Israel, a country,
      where Christians are persecute, beaten and humiliated, became the most
      important "friend" of the Christian world? How comes that the most brutal
      regimes in the world - like India, Israel, Pakistan, or Kazakstan, were
      called democracies? Why and by whom Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, South Korea,
      Kazahstan, Israel and other countries with hatred to European culture
      and anti-European propaganda were considered as allays - and Iraq, Lebanon,
      Iran, or Serbia - not? Tyranny, starvation, exploitation of children,
      numbers of repressed people, scale of poverty and homelessness in Iraq,
      Iran, and some other anti-democracies are several times lower then in
      "great democracies" like India or Israel, where wide number of people
      are treated like cattle. Instead of supporting nations, which are historically,
      traditionally, culturally closer to Europeans, our rulers, corrupted
      or threatened by the Eastern regimes like Israel, are supporting our
      most furious enemies. Support, which is given to the Jewish Extremists
      by the governments of the Western world, is not popular. People are
      not supporting it. Sooner or later this situation will resolve in pogroms
      and insults against the ordinary Jews. We all must be awaken before
      it not too late...
      MORE (1)
      CONTENT
      1. Demonizing nations
      (Jewish extremists' lie and columniation of the whole nations like Ukrainians and Polish)
      2. Israel-Jewish Diaspora World-Wide criminal activity
      (Jewish extremists lobbism is behind the cover up of the Israel-related criminal activity world wide and money laundering)
      3. Dissidents - victims of the Jewish Extremists' global totalitarian power (Israeli military assault against Western democracy)
      (Thousands or maybe millions of people are persecuted by Jewish totalitarian machine all over the world. Persecutions include kidnapping, executions, assassinations, batteries, and administrative, financial and other terror)
      4. Politically and Criminally Motivated Jewish Medical Mafia
      5. Victor Ostrovsky's "By Way of Deception" extracts
      1. Demonizing nations
      (Jewish extremists' lie and columniation of the whole nations like Ukrainians and Polish)
      FROM UKRAINIAN ARCHIVE WEB SITE
      http://ukar.org/
      HOME DISINFORMATION 60 MINUTES 19628 hits since 26Jan98
      We saw above that an entire Ukrainian family was shot by the Nazis for hiding a Jewish woman,
      but can we find a single instance of an entire Jewish family being shot by the Bolsheviks for hiding
      a Ukrainian woman? We saw above that the Ukrainian mayor of a town was shot by the Nazis for
      helping Jews, but can we find a single instance of a Jewish mayor - and there were many
      Jewish mayors in Ukraine - being shot by the Bolsheviks for helping Ukrainians? We saw above
      Metropolitan Sheptytsky risking his life and the lives of other Ukrainians by hiding Jews on church
      property, but can we find a single instance of a rabbi risking his life and the lives of other Jews by
      hiding Ukrainians on synagogue property?
      The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes
      Lubomyr Prytulak
      Last updated:
      9Feb98 Rudolph Vrba Accusation added to the section on "Paralysis of the Comparative Function"
      24Feb98 Einsatzgruppen quotes added to the section on "What Happened in Lviv?"
      28Mar98 Himmler quote added toward the bottom of "Were Ukrainians Nazis?"
      9Jun98 Link to Shapoval added toward the bottom of "What Happened in Lviv? During the preceding few days"
      13Jun98 Link to Sion-Osnova Controversy added to the bottom of "Quality of Translation"
      13Jun98 Link to discussion of Jewish Ghetto Police added to the bottom of "Collective Guilt"
      24Feb99 Comparison of German SS and Ukrainian Waffen-SS oaths added to "The Galicia Division"
      24Mar99 External link to Symon Petliura page at bottom of "Symon Petliura"
      12Jun99 Elaboration with external link at bottom of "Sol Littman's Mengele Scare"
      13Jun99 Comment on Jewish chain of command within CBS added to "Preface"
      03Jul99 Nine quotes added near bottom of "What Happened in Lviv?"
      CONTENTS:
      Preface
      The Galicia Division
      Quality of Translation
      Ukrainian Homogeneity
      Were Ukrainians Nazis?
      Simon Wiesenthal
      What Happened in Lviv?
      Nazi Propaganda Film
      Collective Guilt
      Paralysis of the Comparative
      Function
      60 Minutes' Cheap Shots
      Ukrainian Anti-Semitism
      Jewish Ukrainophobia
      Mailbag
      A Sense of Responsibility
      What 60 Minutes Should Do
      PostScript
      Preface
      On 23 Oct 1994, CBS television broadcast a twelve-minute segment on its weekly
      investigative-journalism show 60 Minutes titled The Ugly Face of Freedom, produced by Jeffrey
      Fager and hosted by Morley Safer. The program's goal was to indict Ukrainian society and
      history and to discredit the legitimacy of the Ukrainian State. The program's method was to
      pack the broadcast with what may be the most concentrated segment of disinformation, calumny,
      and hatred ever to make its appearance in the mainstream media. The program had been ready for
      over half a year, but was not broadcast until the first official visit to the United States of
      Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma. Whether this timing was by coincidence or design became the
      subject of comment among some program viewers.
      From the beginning of the affair, it could not escape notice that this broadcast was not only an
      attack upon Ukrainians and upon the nation of Ukraine, but that it was a Jewish attack, this
      because every last person bearing responsibility for the broadcast, from the very top of the
      chain of command to the very bottom, was Jewish:
      Laurence Tisch, Chairman and CEO of CBS
      Eric Ober, President of CBS News
      Don Hewitt, Executive Producer of 60 Minutes
      Jeffrey Fager, Producer of The Ugly Face of Freedom
      Morley Safer, Program Host
      Simon Wiesenthal, one of the two featured program witnesses
      Yaakov Bleich, the other of the two featured program witnesses
      That attacks upon Ukraine come overwhelmingly from Jews has been amply documented on the
      Ukrainian Archive (UKAR), as for example in the discussion of Jerzy Kosinski, where it is noted
      that ten out of ten of the leading calumniators of Ukraine are Jews. Possible reasons for this
      phenomenon have been discussed throughout UKAR, with three of the chief reasons being: (1) the
      acceleration of the brain drain from Ukraine to Israel with the help of a partly-magnified and
      partly-incited resentment against Jews, (2) the heightening of Jewish cohesion through the
      inculcation of fear and hatred of Gentiles, as by the Jewish keeping alive of a distorted memory
      of the Khmelnytsky rebellion of 1648, and (3) the need to discredit the historical observation
      that Jews typically victimize Ukrainians by inculcating the opposite image of Ukrainians
      victimizing Jews.
      On 15 Nov 1994, I mailed a letter to then CBS Chairman Laurence A. Tisch which consisted of a
      lengthy critique of the 60 Minutes broadcast. I simultaneously mailed copies of this letter to
      the host of the broadcast, Morley Safer, as well as the co-hosts Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Lesley
      Stahl, and Mike Wallace. I received no reply from any of them. On 17 Dec 1994, I mailed a
      covering letter to Laurence Tisch together with an expanded version of my critique (the critique
      was now titled The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes, and was dated 11 Dec 1994), with copies to the same
      host and co-hosts. I again received no reply.
      In an attempt to clarify the accuracy of the 60 Minutes broadcast, other letters were sent,
      among them letters to Michael Jordan, Chairman of Westinghouse, following the Westinghouse
      purchase of CBS in 1995, letters to Simon Wiesenthal, star witness on The Ugly Face of Freedom,
      and letters to Rabbi Yaakov Bleich, supporting witness on the same program. Nor were my letters
      the only ones sent - in fact, CBS received some 16,000 pieces of mail protesting the 60 Minutes
      broadcast. To my knowledge, not a single one of these letters has ever been answered, or even
      acknowledged, the muteness of CBS and others involved leaving the impression that they are
      unable to muster any defense for the 60 Minutes broadcast.
      At that time, and since, I have circulated copies of my critique widely, and have received many
      favorable comments. In a small number of instances, I was grateful for helpful suggestions as
      to minor revisions; however, no one challenged any of my major criticisms or arguments,
      encouraging me to believe that these were fundamentally correct.
      Below you will find the latest version of this same critique, substantially longer and more
      detailed than the original, but basically offering no more than an elaboration of the material
      already long in the hands of CBS. I will not again waste postage mailing this critique to CBS
      with the advent of the internet, there are less costly ways to disseminate information; if CBS
      wants to see this latest version, it will have no trouble finding it.
      The defects of the 60 Minutes broadcast as so multifarious, that it is difficult to capture them
      in one brief statement. If one were to attempt to do so, then the statement might mention that
      60 Minutes misrepresented the historical record, provided mistranslations of statements
      originally made in Ukrainian, suppressed pertinent information concerning Ukrainian-Jewish
      relations during World War II, encouraged retrogressive notions of collective guilt, altered the
      dates on which events were supposed to have occurred, doctored the sound track, accepted dubious
      and implausible statements from sources whose credibility had not been established or whose
      credibility should have been suspect, and generally in numerous instances employed questionable
      evidence to point to conclusions that were untrue, provocative, and inflammatory. There follows
      below an outline of the chief defects of this 60 Minutes broadcast.
      CONTENTS:
      Preface
      The Galicia Division
      Quality of Translation
      Ukrainian Homogeneity
      Were Ukrainians Nazis?
      Simon Wiesenthal
      What Happened in Lviv?
      Nazi Propaganda Film
      Collective Guilt
      Paralysis of the Comparative
      Function
      60 Minutes' Cheap Shots
      Ukrainian Anti-Semitism
      Jewish Ukrainophobia
      Mailbag
      A Sense of Responsibility
      What 60 Minutes Should Do
      PostScript
      The Galicia Division
      60 Minutes' chief piece of evidence for Ukrainian anti-Semitism and predilection for Naziism
      seems to be the official celebrations commemorating the Galicia Division. Elderly men in
      civilian dress are shown wearing military insignia in a recent reunion in the city of Lviv,
      Ukraine (Lvov in Russian, Lwow in Polish, formerly Lemberg). Mr. Safer informs us that
      "Thousands of Ukrainians joined the SS and marched off to fight for Naziism," and that "Nowhere,
      not even in Germany, are the SS so openly celebrated," and that "Many of the Ukrainian men of
      Lvov who marched off as members of the SS never returned - killed fighting for Hitler."
      The impression created in the viewer's mind is that these veterans are unanimously guilty of war
      crimes and crimes against humanity, that they were once supporters of and now continue to be
      admirers of Hitler, that they sympathized with Nazi ambitions during World War II, that they are
      the remnants of a much larger group of Ukrainians who shared a similar orientation, and that as
      their reunion was sanctioned by the Lviv City Council and the Ukrainian Catholic Church, similar
      charges must apply to Ukrainians generally. To all this, however, I must echo Cardinal
      Lubachivsky's words: "It is not true!"
      The Galicia Division was recruited by the Germans only well into the war, in the summer and fall
      of 1943 when they were beginning to experience setbacks on their Eastern front. That the
      Galicia Division was considered an "SS" division does not bear the significance given it by 60
      Minutes - it was a Waffen SS division, which is quite a different thing: "Like other German
      volunteer units, the Division Halychyna [Galicia] was included in the 14th Grenadier Division of
      the SS-Waffen." (Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopaedia, Volume 2, p. 1088.)
      Five qualities of the Galicia Division make it a most atypical component of the stereotype of
      the SS: (1) it was strictly a combat unit and so played no role in the management of
      concentration camps or death camps, (2) its Ukrainian members wore a lion rampant instead of an
      "SS" on their right collars during most of the life of the division, (3) it was accompanied by
      Ukrainian chaplains who attended to the spiritual needs of the troops, (4) it was kept separate
      from other German forces, and (5) it was created with the proviso that it never be used against
      the Western Allies, but only against Soviet forces on the Eastern front. These five qualities
      alone render the Galicia Division an entity unlike any that was being conjured up in the minds
      of 60 Minutes viewers.
      Photographs contrasting different insignia of
      German and Ukrainian members of the Galicia
      Division
      Of course the members of any military unit will be required to swear oaths of obedience to the
      Commander-in-Chief. No fighting force can function without such an oath, and the members of the
      Galicia Division were unable to avoid swearing one. However, compare the differences in the
      German SS oath and the Ukrainian Waffen-SS oath:
      German SS Oath
      "I swear to you Adolf Hitler, as Leader and Chancellor of the Reich, loyalty
      and valor. I vow to you and all those you place over me obedience until
      death, so help me God."
      Ukrainian Waffen-SS Oath
      "I swear by God this holy oath, that in the struggle against Bolshevism I will
      give the Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces, Adolf Hitler, absolute
      obedience, and if it be his will, as a fearless soldier, I will always be
      prepared to lay down my life for this oath." (Richard Landwehr, Fighting for
      Freedom: The Ukrainian Volunteer Division of the Waffen-SS, Bibliophile Legion
      Books, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1985, p. 45)
      Here are three revealing differences between the above oaths: (1) The German SS oath swears to
      Adolf Hitler who happens to be leader, whereas the Ukrainian Waffen-SS oath swears to the leader
      who happens to be Adolf Hitler. (2) The German SS oath does not restrict the Germans to any
      limited role, but the Ukrainian Waffen-SS oath does restrict the Ukrainian role to the "struggle
      against Bolshevism." (3) In the words "obedience until death," the German SS oath appears to
      imply obedience for the rest of one's life, whereas the Ukrainian Waffen-SS oath limits the
      duration of the obedience to the period of service "as a fearless soldier." These are not
      insignificant differences - they constitute an affirmation that the Ukrainians had their own
      goals, and that these overlapped with German goals only on the matter of opposing the Soviet
      re-occupation of Ukraine. For the Ukrainians to have won an even greater variance from the
      fundamental German SS oath would have been for the Germans to accept into their armed forces
      members who were openly declaring recalcitrance and insubordination.
      The Ukrainian motivation for permitting the formation of the Galicia Division was threefold: (1)
      the existence of the division would serve to improve German treatment of Ukrainians in the
      occupied territories, (2) the Division would form the nucleus of a national army which might
      promote Ukrainian aspirations to statehood, and (3) the Division would be thrown into the fight
      to oppose the Soviet re-occupation of Ukraine.
      Even though both Canada and the U.S. have Nazi-hunting units within their respective Justice
      Departments, not a single member of the Division has ever been convicted of any war crime and
      none has ever been charged. The absence of evidence of any wrongdoing not only of the Division
      as a whole, but also of any member of the Division, during his membership in the Division or
      before or after, is widely recognized. Judge Jules Deschenes, heading Canada's Commission of
      Inquiry on War Criminals, concluded that:
      The members of the Galicia Division were individually screened for security
      purposes before admission to Canada. Charges of war crimes against members of
      the Galicia Division have never been substantiated, neither in 1950 when they
      were first preferred, nor in 1984 when they were renewed, nor before this
      Commission. ... In the absence of evidence of participation in or knowledge of
      specific war crimes, mere membership in the Galicia Division is insufficient to
      justify prosecution. (Jules Deschenes, Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals,
      1986, p. 12)
      Judge Deschenes cites a 1947 report of a British Screening Commission which was filed just prior
      to the Galicia Division being moved from Italy to Britain (note that these are the words of the
      1947 British Screening Commission, not of Judge Deschenes):
      They probably were not, and certainly do not now seem to be at heart
      pro-German, and the fact that they did give aid and comfort to the Germans can
      fairly be considered to have been incidental and not fundamental. (in Jules
      Deschenes, Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals, 1986, p. 253)
      A 1950 British Foreign Office report to the Canadian Department of External Affairs concerning
      the Galicia Division was also cited by Judge Deschenes (note that these are the words of the
      1950 British Foreign Office, not of Judge Deschenes):
      While in Italy these men were screened by Soviet and British missions and
      neither then nor subsequently has any evidence been brought to light which
      would suggest that any of them fought against the Western Allies or engaged in
      crimes against humanity. Their behaviour since they came to this country has
      been good and they have never indicated in any way that they are infected with
      any trace of Nazi ideology. ... From the reports of the special mission set
      up by the War Office to screen these men, it seems clear that they volunteered
      to fight against the Red Army from nationalistic motives which were given
      greater impetus by the behaviour of the Soviet authorities during their earlier
      occupation of the Western Ukraine after the Nazi-Soviet Pact. Although
      Communist propaganda has constantly attempted to depict these, like so many